<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24802324</id><updated>2008-01-04T23:33:44.718-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Edifice of Brett - Computers</title><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brett.rosequist.net/computers.html'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24802324/posts/default'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brett.rosequist.net/computers.xml'/><author><name>Brett</name></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24802324.post-115286063237744856</id><published>2006-07-14T01:54:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-07-14T02:06:21.516-05:00</updated><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>ExtremeTech finally got their hands on Intel's next-gen Core 2 processors and &lt;a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1989036,00.asp"&gt;benchmarked them&lt;/a&gt; against AMD's current high-end FX line. These processors are amazing. Not only does the Extreme Edition of the Core 2 perform about 26% faster than the FX-62, it also consumes a lot less power (lowering the heat, increasing the overclocking options, yadda yadda). Since AMD's next-gen line isn't due out until next year, it looks like Intel is going to win back the high performance belt and the respect which comes with it for at least the next year.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brett.rosequist.net/2006/07/extremetech-finally-got-their-hands-on.html' title=''/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=24802324&amp;postID=115286063237744856' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brett.rosequist.net/computers.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24802324/posts/default/115286063237744856'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24802324/posts/default/115286063237744856'/><author><name>Brett</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24802324.post-114556747116874412</id><published>2006-04-20T16:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-04-20T16:11:11.180-05:00</updated><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>There's a neat limited edition version of &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/default.aspx"&gt;Visual Studio&lt;/a&gt; which Microsoft plans on continuing to offer for free into the forseeable future. From how people have commented on it, it isn't a completely crippled version of the software either. It allows you to write and compile usable applications up to a certain degree of complexity.&lt;br /&gt;I may try my hand at C# yet. Maybe over the summer.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://brett.rosequist.net/2006/04/theres-neat-limited-edition-version-of.html' title=''/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=24802324&amp;postID=114556747116874412' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://brett.rosequist.net/computers.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24802324/posts/default/114556747116874412'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24802324/posts/default/114556747116874412'/><author><name>Brett</name></author></entry></feed>